Now if only Vick’s sentence was meted out in dog years…

Filed under: Animals, Celebrity, Law & Disorder — Kelly @ August 27, 2007 7:28 pm

…and he was to become eligible for euthanasia after a three-day stay.

You know, like incarcerated canines.

If only. *

Anyway, that’s enough for Vick-related alerts tonight. You can view an extensive archive here.

* Oh, and Jamie Foxx is a fucking dolt. Just for the record.

(xposted from, just because)

—————————-

Tagged:



Impeach the fuckers.

Filed under: Politics, Law & Disorder — Kelly @ July 14, 2007 10:15 am

Today is Blog for Impeachment Day! Can I get a w00t w00t?!

Via AliceDem at Booman Tribute (by way of Feministe):

On July 14, 1789 a mob of French patriots stormed the Bastille prison. It was proof that power no longer resided in the King.

On July 14, 2007 a group of bloggers from all across America will be blogging for impeachment. We invite all patriots to join us.

Bruce Godfrey, who so graciously hosted the celebrated Take Back the Blog event, has once again offered his services as a host.

We hope by this action we can demonstrate the widespread support for impeachment and shift the debate. We also hope to educate our political elite on the dangers posed by failing to impeach.

It is critically important for the future of our democracy that this criminal cabal and all of their works be repudiated. We ask for your support and participation.

Though Bruce’s announcement primarily asks for

arguments and posts that make the case for impeachment proceedings, for a vote of impeachment or for a removal after trial of any impeachable federal office holder. However, this blogswarm will happily accept well-written anti-impeachment (or pro-impeachment, of course) posts from any member of the Maryland Bloggers Alliance as noted at the blogroll on the left sidebar, or from liberal/civil libertarian bloggers offering a principled, political or practical case for opposition to impeachment from that perspective. Academic scholarship on impeachment would be MOST welcome to contribute to the debate for all involved.

this featherhead’s legal expertise is nascent at best. If the whole of the Bush presidency doesn’t constitute impeachable offenses, I don’t know what does. (Sentencing 68,000 women to death annually because they had the temerity to have teh sex? Check. Slaughtering 974,000 Iraqis to stroke daddy’s ego? Check. Thumbing your nose at the Constitution? Check, check, and check.) And that’s really the bulk of my argument - call it the “WTF!?%$#” line of reasoning. If Clinton’s hummer was enough to get him nearly-impeached, then Bush (and Cheney and Rove and Gonzalez) ought to be strung up in the public square by their elephantitic nutsacks. Common sense and human decency, people.

Anyway, in lieu of an “academic” “legal” “argument”, I come bearing a big fat link roundup of impeach-the-fucker resources. Hope y’all will let me in on the party, even if all I have to offer is the warm shit beer.

On that note, do check in with Bruce to read the more, ahem, mature impeachment posts.

Crazy impeachment goodness after the flip. It’s like a librrrl’s wet dream down there.

(more…)



More on AETA & the ACLU

Filed under: Animals, Current Events, Law & Disorder, War on Terra — Kelly @ November 16, 2006 11:37 pm

Again, crossposted from easyVegan.info. A follow-up to Tuesday’s post.

————

BORDC on the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA)
November 16th, 2006 11:35 pm by Kelly

The following is an excerpt from the Bill of Rights Defense Committee’s November 2006 newsletter. I’d never heard of the BORDC until a commenter on GreenIsTheNewRed.com pointed it out (so thanks, commenter Sheila!). My understanding was that the next step was for AETA to go to Bush’s desk for signing (something that’s probably futile to protest - Bush doesn’t exactly *heart* civil liberties), but according to this alert, the “suspension calendar,” which includes AETA, still has to be voted on by the House. So please take a moment to write your rep and ask that s/he vote against the “suspension calendar” - and explain why.

Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act

On November 13, the House passed the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA) as part of a list of “non-controversial” bills that will be voted up or down in one bundle. The bill is considered a threat to activists, because it expands the definition of terrorist, and could impinge on First Amendment activities. Heidi Boghosian, director of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), said the bill “sets a dangerous precedent for going after people based on the content of their speech.” NLG President Marjorie Cohn said, “The AETA could lead to the prosecution of undercover investigators, whistle-blowers and other activists as ‘terrorists.’” The Senate unanimously passed its version of the bill in September so if the House votes “aye” on its “suspension calendar,” the AETA will become law.

What you can do: Contact your Congressional representative at 202-224-3121 and ask that she or he vote no on the “suspension calendar”—which is the bundle of bills which will be presented to the House of Representatives for an up or down vote. Tell your representative the “suspension calendar” contains a toxic bill which interferes with First Amendment rights.

Kinship Circle also sent out another email regarding AETA today, this one dealing with common questions/myths. One concerns the ACLU’s support/opposition of the bill; KC’s conclusion is that the ACLU did oppose it. Given what I’ve read - both on GreenIsTheNewRed.com and from the ACLU itself - it still looks to me as though the ACLU rescinded their opposition to AETA somewhere between March and October of 2006. In other words, they screwed us. But I’ll refrain from posting the Kinship Circle alert and my comments until I hear more. As a longtime ACLU supporter, I so desperately want to be wrong.

—————

Tagged:



I never thought I’d say this, but shame on the ACLU!

Filed under: Animals, Current Events, Law & Disorder, War on Terra — Kelly @ November 14, 2006 6:27 pm

The following is crossposted from easyVegan.info. It’s another rant about AETA, this time in relation to the ACLU, which inexplicable withdrew its opposition to AETA and allowed it to fly through the Senate and House unchallenged. Keep reading for more (and apologies in advance for some of the initial overlap with my last post.)

———–

For Shame!: AETA Passes the House
November 14th, 2006 6:23 pm by Kelly

As I mentioned earlier, AETA passed the House yesterday afternoon; out of the House and the Senate, the only Congressperson who voted against it was Dennis Kucinich.

As described by Dr. Alex Hershaft (FARM’s President/Founder and co-founder of the Equal Justice Alliance), the voting process was nefarious, to say the least:

Today (11/13/06), a dozen of us from Equal Justice Alliance, FARM, League of Humane Voters, and Compassion Over Killing spent five hours visiting Congressional offices and urging them to vote against AETA, which had been scheduled over the weekend for a sudden vote at 6:30 pm. We were carrying suporting statements from the National Lawyers Guild, the New York City Bar Association, and the Natural Resources Defense Council. At each office, we were told that the mail and calls were running overwhelmingly in our favor.

Around 3pm, one of the legislative aides said that the bill was just being debated on the House floor. He gave me a pass, and I rushed to the Capitol across the street. I was astonished to see only about six House members present. House Judiciary Chairman Sensenbrenner spoke in favor of AETA, quoting Jerry Vlasak’s and other’s past extreme statements. Dennis Kucinich joined in abhorring violence, but noted that the bill infringed on civil liberties of people conducting civil disobedience or undercover investigations. Sensenbrenner invoked lack of opposition from the ACLU. Then the chair called for a voice vote, and Kucinich cast the only no vote. It was all over in 15 minutes.

After the vote, I rode the elevator with Sensenbrenner and chief AETA sponsor Petri. I told them I was there to lobby against their bill. Sensenbrenner replied “don’t blame me; I was just managing the bill for this guy,” pointing to Petri, who smiled sheepishly. The whole thing was absolutely surreal.

We played the game by their rules, we generated an overwhelming outpouring of opposition to the bill on short notice, and they kicked us in the face through underhanded maneuvers. Then they wonder why people lose faith in the system and take the law into their own hands. Today, Congress brought shame on itself by turning animal activists into “terrorists.”

Apparently, it wasn’t enough for our legislators to ignore their non-corporate constituents and wipe their arses with the Constitution, but they couldn’t even do so in an open debate. They fast-tracked the bill and then voted on it hours before scheduled, with only six Reps. present. Wonderful. It certainly takes the joy out of last week’s victories.

Though I fully expected the House to vote in favor of AETA - particularly in light of the Senate’s unanimous satisfaction with it - I’m still disappointed with the sheer number of Reps. who kowtowed to Big Business, and did so in an underhanded manner, to boot. Even more so, however, I am shocked and appalled by the ACLU.

Yesterday, I reported that the ACLU was one of the 160+ organizations that opposed AETA. However, I was (sorely) mistaken. I based my comment on an ACLU letter dated 3/6/06 and addressed to Congress, “ACLU Letter to Congress Urging Opposition to the Animal Enterprise Act, S. 1926 and H.R. 4239,” in which the ACLU explicitly voice their opposition to AETA. Yet, they rescinded their opposition after some minor changes were made - changes which fail to protect the First Amendment rights of animal advocates working within the confines of the law.

I have long been a supporter of the ACLU, and this stunning lack of spine from America’s largest champion of First Amendment rights is a bitter pill indeed. Of all the outrages surrounding AETA, this is perhaps the hardest for me to swallow. The lack of ethics, morals, and fairness (not to mention respect for the Constitution) among our politicians is nothing new. But the ACLU? For Chrissakes, I expect better from them.

It’s especially egregious that an organization which defends Fred Phelps’ First Amendment right to picket the funerals of American heroes - defaming our fallen soldiers and taunting their families with such delightful ditties as

First to fight
For the fags
Now they’re coming home in bags
And the army goes marching to hell.

Proud of all of your sin
No more battles you will win
And the army goes marching to hell.

Now it’s IEDs
The army’s on its knees
Count off the body parts all gone — Two! Three! — and where e’er they go
The dying soldiers show
The army keeps marching to hell.

with such glee - declines to defend peaceful, well-intentioned animal rights/welfare activists.

Well, shame on the ACLU! The current graphics on their main page boast, “Demanding Truth and Accountability” and “Stop the Abuse of Power: Demand Answers, Restore Justice, End Abuses; It’s time to restore lost liberties.” So, here’s an idea: contact the ACLU and demand to know why they wouldn’t stand up for the civil liberties of animal rights advocates. Obviously, AETA was of little consequence to the ACLU. Yet, it opens the door for our elected sheeple to target other activists, organization, and movements. Whether you work towards a woman’s right to choose, against discrimination based on sexual orientation, or for equal opportunities for all, AETA concerns you.

And it most certainly concerns the ACLU, whose self-described mission is to protect every American citizens’ Constitutional rights:

* Your First Amendment rights-freedom of speech, association and assembly. Freedom of the press, and freedom of religion supported by the strict separation of church and state.

* Your right to equal protection under the law - equal treatment regardless of race, sex, religion or national origin.

* Your right to due process - fair treatment by the government whenever the loss of your liberty or property is at stake.

* Your right to privacy - freedom from unwarranted government intrusion into your personal and private affairs.

So shoot them a politely outraged letter, or better yet, give ‘em a call.

You can find brief talking points at www.NoAETA.org, and a more detailed breakdown of the legislation and its many problems at GreenIsTheNewRed.com.

Mailing address:

American Civil Liberties Union
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004

Online Feedback form:

www.aclu.org/contact/general/index.html

Contact information for members/membership help. (Cancel your membership or tell them that you won’t join/support the ACLU as long as they discriminate against animal rights advocates.)

E-mail: membership [at] aclu.org

Phone: (212) 549-2585

Contact information for local affiliate offices:

State-by-state list here: www.aclu.org/affiliates/

If you can find additional contact information, please let me know, or leave it in the comments.

* Action alerts from org’s working against AETA to follow. *

—————-

Tagged:



You could be next.

Filed under: Animals, Current Events, Law & Disorder, War on Terra — Kelly @ November 14, 2006 1:30 pm

“First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out.

“Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out.

“Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out.

“And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”

- Pastor Martin Niemoeller

——

No AETA Banner - 234x60

The House passed AETA yesterday afternoon; of all our elected sheeple Congresspeople, only one had the convictions to vote against this blatantly unconstitutional and unconscionable example of pandering: Dennis Kucinich, D-OH. Love him. Too bad he’s one of a kind.

For those not in the know, AETA stands for “Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act”. The Senate passed it (S. 3880) unanimously in October; the House version (H. 4239) was fast-tracked “as part of the suspension calendar: in other words it was put on a list of non-controversial bills to pass with one swoop by voice vote.” It was passed yesterday afternoon, hours ahead of the scheduled vote. (Kind of like one last “fuck you” to the 160+ organizations and thousands of individuals who opposed the bill.)

In a nutshell, AETA strips animal and environmental advocates of their First Amendment rights:

AETA unjustly singles out animal protection groups because of political ideology, and silences lawful advocacy seeking to expose animal cruelty violations.

AETA does not genuinely fight terrorism. AETA would take valuable taxpayer money and resources away from real terrorism.

Existing laws sufficiently punish criminal activity. Laws already exist to protect industries against illegal actions, regardless of who commits the acts. Indictments and convictions have been made based on current federal laws, specifically, the Animal Enterprise Protection Act of 1992 and the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act of 2002. AETA’s additional penalties are excessive and drastically expand the 1992 and 2002 Acts.

AETA’s exceptionally severe penalties do not fit the crime. According to the United States Sentencing Commission, the 2005 median sentence in federal courts for:

* larceny = 4 months
* embezzlement = 4 months
* sexual abuse = 4.5 years
* manslaughter = 3 years

By contrast, AETA proposes one year for an offense involving no threatened or actual economic damage or bodily harm, and up to 20 years for economic damage!

AETA is overly broad and vague. Innocent parties may not know if they are acting within the law. AETA may tar honest citizens wrongfully charged with the terrorist smudge. Whether or not they triumph in court, their reputation may be irreparably damaged.

Several corporations that support AETA are repeat offenders. They have been cited for numerous animal welfare violations. These corporations have a vested interest in silencing lawful dissent.

“Animal Enterprise” includes almost every retail business in the United States. Nearly every business “sells … animal products for profit.” That includes grocery stores and restaurants (meat/dairy products), shoe stores (leather shoes), and clothing stores (wool sweaters).

AETA singles out animal rights (and even less “zealous” animal welfare) advocates and treats their criminal offenses more harshly than those of other activists/criminals. Additionally, previously lawful and peaceful activities, such as protesting an event, engaging in a letter campaign, or organizing a boycott, could be considered “terrorism” under AETA. Sponsored by corporate animal abusers, AETA allows these businesses to continue their inhumane practices unchallenged.

Ostensibly, AETA targets “those crazy animal rights extremists” - but the truth is, you could be next.

AETA seeks to punish those activists who cause not just property, but also economic damage to “animal enterprises,” no matter if this damage is a result of legal activities that fall within the realm of free speech. The fact of the matter is that activists everywhere campaign against that which they find unjust, with the goal of ending said injustice. If we allow AETA to stand unchallenged, your cause - be it a woman’s right to choose, ending discrimination against gay/lesbian/transgendered individuals, or economic equality for all - may be Big Business’ next target.

If you’d like to learn more about AETA, I’ve posted a number of action alerts on my AR blog, easyVegan.info (click here for AETA search results.) The Equal Justice Alliance - at www.noaeta.org- has a wealth of coverage, as does Will Potter at GreenIsTheNewRed.com.

————

Tagged: